Victor Lilov vs Diego Jarry Fillol Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance shows that Fillol wins 42.22% of points, while Lilov achieves 44.57%. Could this slight edge indicate better overall service stability for Lilov? Possibly.
• When it comes to return games, Fillol has demonstrated superior performance by winning 54% of second serve return points, compared to Lilov's 47.31%.
• On first serve returns, Lilov narrowly leads with 30.89% over Fillol's 28.95%. Can this affect the match outcome? Indeed, every percentage point counts in tennis.
• Under pressure, Fillol saves 52.63% of breakpoints while Lilov saves 50%. Slightly better breakpoint resilience gives Fillol an advantage under critical moments.
• Looking at their overall match win rates in the past year, Fillol struggles with a 33.33% win rate, while Lilov holds a 48.72% record.
• Both players prefer clay courts, but Lilov's 55% win rate indicates stronger aptitude compared to Fillol's 45% on the same surface.
• In Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuits, Lilov has secured more wins, with 55.88% compared to Fillol's 33.33%, suggesting Lilov plays consistently at this level.
• Match toughness is evident in opponent quality, as Lilov has faced higher-ranked players on average, at 95.9, against Fillol's 183.22.
• In deciding sets, Lilov excels by winning 67% while Fillol stands at 50%, indicating Lilov's better performance in clutch situations.
• Lastly, Fillol exhibits a highly efficient breakpoint conversion rate at 71.43%, significantly outperforming Lilov's 35.4%. Will this be decisive during tight games? Highly likely.

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

Fillol demonstrates strength in break point conversion and returning games, showcasing a capability to capitalize on opponent weaknesses and serve excellently when under pressure. However, his overall match win percentage and experience against higher-ranked opponents fall short when compared to Lilov. This might present challenges in matches against experienced and consistent opponents.

Lilov, with a superior overall match win rate and a higher performance in deciding sets, suggests more consistency and resilience in matches. His experience against better-ranked opponents has likely poised him to handle challenging matches effectively. Furthermore, his better second serve point win rate could provide an edge over Fillol despite his weaker breakpoint conversion rate.

Weighing all factors and performance trends, Lilov appears to have a slight edge in this upcoming match. His combination of experience, consistency, and ability to perform in decisive moments makes Lilov the likely winner in this tennis encounter.